E-commerce, transaction cost, and the network of division of labour: a business perspective

Heling Shi, Hayden Mathysen
Department of Economics
Monash University
April 2002

This paper examines the positive impact of E-commerce on transaction efficiency that exist in market exchange and within the firm. The E-commerce induced fall in transaction costs is unleashing a revolution in the mode and conduct of market exchange. The ease of information dissemination and the unique properties of online trade have enabled more efficient and more informed market behaviour. Understandably then, this smooth intermediary for the execution of transactions has realised exponential growth. The decline in transaction costs may well explain why, in the past few years, we have been observing a spate of business restructuring characterised by vertical integration and the concurrent phenomena of horizontal integration. Online trade has also facilitated greater fluidity of labour exchange by eroding the transaction costs that reside in the labour market. Moreover, it is expected that E-commerce may fundamentally transform the nature of international trade.

1. Introduction

In the US and other industrialised economies multinational conglomerates continue to dominate the economy. The wave of corporate mergers and consolidations seemingly indicate this trend may continue. Yet evidence exists of another phenomenon that is emerging; these corporate leviathans are participating in a spate of corporate downsizing and vertical disintegration. What adds an element of paradox to this new phenomenon is that it is occurring in an economy that has been booming for three years and expanding for nine. After successive years of economic expansion since 1991, the spate of corporate downsizing remains unabated. The paradoxical incidence of downsizing in an economic boom has been explained away by cyclical factors external to the economy such as an inflated dollar, an Asian economic downturn and a Russian economic crisis. It is believed these external factors may have fuelled the intensity of price competition and cost cutting in the domestic economy, and thus has precipitated a wave of downsizing. In early 1998, when cyclical induced downsizing was highlighted in Business Week as the cause, it was also supplemented by an explanation that firms expected slow profit growth throughout 1998. This supplementary explanation is advanced to reinforce the conjecture that even the expectation of cyclical swings was enough to initiate corporate downsizing during an economic boom. Research by Budros (1999) supports this explanation. The attempt by many US companies to enhance organisational efficiency and/or effectiveness through downsizing has been discovered by Budros to be consistent with expectations of poor growth prospects. However, in early 1998 Fortune¡¯s Business Confidence Index advances contradictory evidence on expectations of growth and business confidence. Despite tremors of an Asian downturn business confidence remained strong in the early months of 1998.

Given the contradictory evidence, can expectations of slower growth satisfactorily explain why U.S. corporations possess a renewed zest for downsizing? Probably not. While the Asian downturn fuelled expectations of slower profit growth and the Russian crisis dented business confidence in 1998, these concerns were transitory and gradually paled into insignificance when U.S. economic activity did not falter. In 1999, restructuring and downsizing continued apace despite the boom. For instance, layoff announcements were hitting record levels, which is evidence of business restructuring (Melcher, 1999). Moreover, the American Management Association¡¯s latest annual survey of nearly 1,200 major companies discovered that in mid-1999 a quarter of respondents said they had actually downsized in the prior 12 months (Koretz, 2000).

The evidence suggests that structural, and not expectational phenomena are at work, and these phenomena by no means insignificant. Parallel to the spate of corporate downsizing and vertical disintegration in the U.S. economy is the emergence of the Internet Revolution. Net-driven growth is accelerating and may well explain the structural transformation in the economy characterised by a continuous wave of corporate downsizing. Not only are new online firms entering the fray, but established brand name companies are also embracing the net. The revolution of the Internet and the emergence of E-commerce have induced companies to rapidly restructure their operations to reach new operational efficiencies through their business-to-business commerce over the Internet. The emergence of E-commerce has introduced fundamental and dramatic changes to the way corporations conduct business. For instance, consider the impact of the Net on supply and distribution networks. The chief economist at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Stephen Roach, calculates that the E-commerce combination of business-to-business and business-to-consumer will reduce the labour force in the distribution sector of the economy by 35% over the next five years. This works out to be marginally more than a 1% increase in the overall corporate profit share of GDP (Farrell, 2000).

Due to a precipitous decline in transaction costs from Internet based commerce it may be efficient for firms to restructure themselves around E-commerce. The radical transformations in the conduct of business entail fundamental restructuring of existing operations, which may involve downsizing and vertical disintegration. The intuition behind the impact of E-commerce on transaction costs and the concomitant wave of vertical disintegration and downsizing is illustrated formally by Liu and Yang (2000) research into the size of the firm and transaction costs. As transaction efficiency is higher in the exchange of intermediate goods than that for labour, then organising division of labour between more specialised firms and individuals is more efficient than organising division of labour within the entity of the firm. Consequently, with the increase in the level of specialisation of firms and the rise in the division of labour between micro-businesses and individuals, average employment of firms decline. The dynamics of this model receive empirical support.

Malone and Laubacher (1998) reveal that in 1973 a Fortune 500 company employed one in five U.S. workers. Today the ratio has fallen to one in ten.

If it is relatively cheaper to conduct transactions internally the size of the firm grows larger. However, if it is relatively cheaper to conduct transactions between separate firm entities, firms remain small or shrink. The advent of E-commerce drives the transaction efficiency in intermediate goods higher, reducing to cost of inter-firm exchange and hence precipitating a wave of downsizing and vertical disintegration. Internet commerce permits the instant and inexpensive sharing and dissemination of information among many people in many locations (Malone and Laubacher, 1998). Centralised decision-making and expensive bureaucracies necessary to collate, process and disseminate information, and coordinate actions within a large conglomerate have become outmoded and inefficient. Micro-entities even on an individual level can effectively manage themselves, as electronic networks enable fluid coordination and exchange between independent micro-entities. E-commerce not only permits fluid business-to-business exchange but the electronic network allow microbusinesses to tap into the global reservoirs of information, expertise and financing previously enjoyed by only large firms, whilst retaining the beneficial attributes of leanness, flexibility and creativity of being small.

Despite the spate of vertical disintegration the large industrial organisation continues to dominate the economy. The life of these conglomerates appears to be sustained by a concurrent wave of horizontal mergers and acquisitions. The last two years abound with many examples of horizontal merger mania. For example, British Airlines allies with American Airlines who in turn allies with US airways, Compaq buys Digital Electronic Corporation, Citibank merges with Travelers, Daimler Benz acquires Chrysler, etc. The phenomena of vertical disintegration and horizontal alliances/mergers are occurring simultaneously. The latter can also be attributed to the evolution of online technology, which has produced a decline in agency cost within a firm. With the introduction of intranet or email within the entity of the firm there is far greater fluidity and less distortion in information flows between the CEO and the firm¡¯s employees. No longer must important pieces of information flow through the distortionary filters of each successive hierarchical layer before reaching the CEO. Information flows directly from employees to the top layer of management, via the intranet, which raises the efficacy of management control and performance monitoring. The diseconomies of large-scale production attributed to agency cost are now attenuated or eliminated. The enhanced ability of managers to control conglomerates effectively without the significant agency cost diseconomies has enabled a spate of alliances, mergers and acquisitions. Horizontally integrated firms, utilising the technology of the intranet, do not incur the substantial transaction costs in monitoring the performance of their employees. This enables stronger returns to horizontal alliances and mergers.

This paper investigates the impact of E-commerce on market exchange and transaction costs. Section 2 provides a theoretical foundation ¨C inframarginal analysis, to investigate the impacts of E-commerce on the network division of labour. Section 3 examines the prospects of E-commerce, particularly its prospects for exchange facilitation. Section 4 underscores the impact of E-commerce on the many transaction costs that exist in goods and services market and in labor exchange. It also unveils therelationship between E-commerce, transaction costs and business restructuring. Section 5 concludes the paper by presenting some broad forecasts for E-commerce.

 

Download

 

Inframarginal Econimics Society www.inframarginal.com

 

© INFRAMARGINAL ECONOMICS --- ALL RIGHT RESERVED